Month: February 2025

Books Read in January 2025

Published on by Margaret2 Comments

I read 4 books in January, half the number I used to read. My reading has slowed down considerably over the last 2 years and I no longer write in much detail about them. But this year I’m hoping to get back to something more like normal and I’m aiming to write at least a paragraph or more about each of the books I’ve read each month.

There’s a Reason for Everything (my review) by E R Punshon 4* – I began this book in December and finished reading it in early January. It was first published in 1945 and I read the e-book published by Dean Street Press. It’s the 21st in the Bobby Owen mystery series, in which Bobby has recently been promoted from Inspector to Deputy Chief Constable of Wychshire, a complicated novel with murders, a missing painting allegedly by Vermeer, dodgy fine art dealers and an abandoned country mansion called Nonpareil.

I was perplexed for quite some time until I began to see what was behind the bewildering confusion in Punshon’s narrative. I think this is a cleverly constructed plot, with ingenious puzzles to piece together before all the answers are revealed. I was quite pleased to find out at the end that I’d worked out one of the clues correctly.

Sense and Sensibility by Jane Austen 5* – It’s about the three Dashwood sisters and their widowed mother as they leave their family estate at Norland Park after their father’s death when their half-brother John inherited the estate. This year is the 250th anniversary of Jane Austen’s birth, so this is an ideal time to reread some of her books and I’m joining Brona at This Reading Life in her Austen 2025 project to reread her books, along with the Classics Club’s Sync Read (or readalong).

I read the annotated edition, edited by David M Shapard that gives Explanations of historical context, Citations from Austen’s life, letters, and other writings, Definitions and clarifications, Literary comments and analysis, Multiple maps of England and London, An introduction, bibliography, and detailed chronology of events and More than 100 informative illustrations.

I’ll write more about this book in a later post.

Signal Moon by Kate Quinn 5* – a short story. I’m not a big fan of short stories, often finding them too short and wanting to know more. But this one is good and it fascinated me. It’s sci-fi involving a type of time-travelling, a mix of historical fiction, links to the code breakers at Bletchley Park and WW2. I loved it. It is, of course, impossible, set in two time periods, 1943 during World War 2 and 2023, but I didn’t have to work hard to believe in it. Kate Quinn’s narrative just drew me in. In 1943, Lily Baines is a Wren working for a “Y” station, picking up signals from German intelligence that were then sent to Bletchley Park for translation. Then she picks up a signal apparently from 2023 – it’s a cry for help from Matt Jackson a young US officer. It’s about an American ship that is taking heavy fire in the North Atlantic. Together Lily and Matt have to work out how to help each other: Matt to convince her that the war she’s fighting can still be won, and Lily to help him stave off the war to come.

Kate Quinn wrote this story to feature the information about the Y stations that she had discovered whilst researching Bletchley Park and hadn’t included in The Rose Code.

Keir Starmer: the Biography by Tom Baldwin 3.5* A Times Book of the Year; A Telegraph Book of the Year; A Daily Mail Book of the Year; A Waterstones Book of the Year

Dsecription from Amazon:

This authoritative – but not authorised – biography by Tom Baldwin provides answers by drawing deeply on many hours of interviews with Prime Minister himself, as well as unprecedented access to members of his family, his oldest friends and closest colleagues.Together, they tell an unexpectedly intimate story filled with feelings of grief and love that has driven him on more than any rigid ideology or loyalty to a particular faction.

The book tracks Starmer’s emergence from a troubled small town background and rebellious youth, through a storied legal career as a human rights barrister and the country’s chief prosecutor, to becoming an MP relatively late in life.Baldwin provides a vivid and compelling account of how this untypical politician then rose to be leader of his party in succession to Jeremy Corbyn, then transformed it with a ruthless rapidity that has enraged opponents from the left just as much as it has bewildered those on the right.

Above all, this is a book that should be read by anyone who wants to understand how someone who has too often been underestimated or dismissed as dull, now intends to change Britain.

My thoughts

This book was published in February 2024, five months before the General Election. I decided to watch the televised debates between him and Rishi Sunak, the then Prime Minister, and thought Starmer looked uncomfortable in most of them. All I knew about him was that he was the former Director of Public Prosecutions, and, as he often said in interviews, that growing up he lived in a pebble-dashed semi , that his ‘dad was a toolmaker‘ and his ‘mother was a nurse.’ So I hoped that Baldwin’s book would tell me more. Baldwin writes:

Starmer is a private man who has chosen to place himself in the white light of public scrutiny, while showing a determination that is itself exceptional to maintain a semblance of normality … often appearing uncomfortable at being a politician at all. (page xi)

He also describes him as ‘someone who is both extraordinary and very ordinary‘ (page xii). The biography is divided into five parts :

each of which begins by sketching a moment since he became a politician when this tension is most apparent. All of them also include descriptions of sometimes traumatic episodes that have wrenched him back to real life and away from the febrile – often fake – world of Westminster politics. (page xii).

In the first three parts he covers Starmer’s childhood and schooldays, his time as a student at Leeds University, where he was awarded a first-class law degree, and then at St Edmund Hall at Oxford University where he gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree. He then worked as a trainee barrister in London, eventually transitioning from a human rights lawyer into the country’s chief prosecutor. The fourth part describes how he became an MP, a member of the shadow cabinet and Leader of the Labour Party. The fifth part examines the leadership, before assessing what kind of prime minister he would make.

One friend said:

He’ll just turn up at the pub and be a totally normal and genuinely good bloke. But his public persona is very different, I almost don’t recognise him when I see him on TV.

And another said:

There is this enormous gap between Keir the human being and Keir the politician. At Jonny [Cooper]’s funeral, I saw the real one letting himself go – in the best way – to share his grief with his friends. But, when I watched him on TV at the party conference, he had seemed to be almost a different person, holding back and distant, almost wooden compared to the generous, humorous and empathetic man I’ve known for twenty years. (page 323)

It seems to me that he is a conscientious person who believes in working hard and playing hard. He is resilient and driven. He believes in fairness and social justice, putting the country before the party, a serious, clever man, who wants to get things done and change the country for the better.

Six Degrees of Separation from  Dangerous Liaisons by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos to Mansfield Park by Jane Austen

Published on by Margaret15 Comments

It’s time again for Six Degrees of Separation, a monthly link-up hosted by Kate at Books Are My Favourite and Best. Each month a book is chosen as a starting point and linked to six other books to form a chain. A book doesn’t need to be connected to all the other books on the list, only to the one next to it in the chain.

This month we start with Dangerous Liaisons by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos first published in 1782 as Les Liaisons Dangereuses. I read this many years ago when I was taking an Open University course and I’ve not reviewed this on my blog. It’s an epistolary novel, told through the letters written by different characters to one another. I loved it. The Goodreads summary describes it as a:

novel of moral and emotional depravity is a disturbing and ultimately damning portrayal of a decadent society. Aristocrats and ex-lovers Marquise de Merteuil and Vicomte de Valmont embark on a sophisticated game of seduction and manipulation to bring amusement to their jaded lives. While Merteuil challenges Valmont to seduce an innocent convent girl, he is also occupied with the conquest of a virtuous married woman. Eventually their human pawns respond, and the consequences prove to be more serious—and deadly—than the players could have ever predicted.

My first link is Lady Susan by Jane Austen, which see wrote between 1794 and 1795, adding a conclusion in 1805, but not published until James Edward Austen-Leigh, her nephew, published it in his Memoir of Jane Austen in 1871.

Lady Susan is about Lady Susan Vernon, told in a series of letters, just like Laclos’s Les Liaisons Dangereuses. Both have manipulative and evil characters without any moral scruples, who delight in their power to seduce others. It’s the  story of an unscrupulous widow who plans to force her daughter into a marriage against her wishes. Lady Susan is an attractive and entertaining and totally wicked character, who nevertheless almost manages to fool people for some of the time at least. She is also trying to captivate her sister-in-law’s brother, whilst still holding on to the affections of a previous lover.

My second link is also a book of letters, but real letters, not fictional ones – Jane Austen’s Letters edited by Deirdre Le Faye, First published in 1932 in this edition Le Faye has added new material that has come to light since 1932, and reordered the letters into their correct chronological sequence. She provided new biographical, topographical and general indexes, annotation, and information on watermarks, postmarks and other physical details of the manuscripts. This gives a unique insight into the daily life of the novelist both intimate and gossipy, observant and informative. The letters bring Jane’s family and friends to life, as well as her surroundings and contemporary events. This is one of my TBRs, but I have dipped into it and read some of the letters.

For my third link I’m staying with Jane Austen with The Genius of Jane Austen: Her Love of Theatre and Why She Is a Hit in Hollywood by Paula Byrne, a radical look at Jane Austen as you’ve never seen her – as a lover of farce, comic theatre and juvenilia. It also looks at stage adaptations of Austen’s novels (including one called Miss Elizabeth Bennet by A. A. Milne) to modern classics, including the BBC Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion, Emma Thompson’s Sense and Sensibility, and Clueless, adapted from Emma.

This book explores Jane Austen’s love of the theatre — she acted in amateur productions, frequently attended the theatre, and even scripted several early works in play form. Austen’s letters show, says Byrne, that she was steeped in theatre and that was a keen theatregoer, watching actors like Dora Jordan.

My fourth link is the theatre and Dora Jordan in Mrs Jordan’s Profession by Claire Tomalin, the biography of Dora Jordan who was acclaimed as the greatest comic actress of her day. Dora and the third son of George III, William, the Duke of Clarence , who, although not legally married, lived together as Mr and Mrs Bland.  She was known as ‘Mrs Jordan’, although there was never a Mr Jordan. She made her stage debut in 1777 at the age of 15 and her first Drury Lane appearance in 1785. The two met and she became his mistress in 1790. The book is packed with information, brilliantly bringing the late 18th and early 19th centuries to life as she tells the story of Dora and her relationship with the Duke of Clarence, later King William IV.

My fifth link is to George III in Alan Bennett’s The Madness of King George. This play premiered on 28 November 1991 and was made into a film in 1994. The introduction to the screenplay includes Bennett’s production diary, notes comparing his stage and screen versions, and the political background to the Court of George III. Also included are a selection of stills from the film. I’ve seen the 1994 film with Nigel Hawthorne as King George and Helen Mirren as Queen Charlotte, which I thought was excellent, but have not read the the book or the play itself.

My final link takes me back to Jane Austen’s books and also to Paula Byrne’s book The Genius of Jane Austen and the theatre. It’s Mansfield Park, which I read about 10 years ago. Fanny Price, as a child of 10 goes to live with her wealthy aunt and uncle, Sir Thomas and Lady Bertram at Mansfield Park. The younger members of the family, convert the library into a theatre and stage a risqué play called Lover’s Vows. I’ll be rereading Mansfield Park later on to refresh my memory and consider what it reveals about Jane Austen’s own views of the theatre in the light of Paula Byrne’s book.

The links in my chain are epistolary novels, Jane Austen’s letters and books, the theatre, and George III, using fiction and nonfiction.

What is in your chain, I wonder?

Next month (March 1, 2025), we’ll start with the 2023 Booker Prize winner, Prophet Song by Paul Lynch.