Six Degrees of Separation from  Dangerous Liaisons by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos to Mansfield Park by Jane Austen

It’s time again for Six Degrees of Separation, a monthly link-up hosted by Kate at Books Are My Favourite and Best. Each month a book is chosen as a starting point and linked to six other books to form a chain. A book doesn’t need to be connected to all the other books on the list, only to the one next to it in the chain.

This month we start with Dangerous Liaisons by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos first published in 1782 as Les Liaisons Dangereuses. I read this many years ago when I was taking an Open University course and I’ve not reviewed this on my blog. It’s an epistolary novel, told through the letters written by different characters to one another. I loved it. The Goodreads summary describes it as a:

novel of moral and emotional depravity is a disturbing and ultimately damning portrayal of a decadent society. Aristocrats and ex-lovers Marquise de Merteuil and Vicomte de Valmont embark on a sophisticated game of seduction and manipulation to bring amusement to their jaded lives. While Merteuil challenges Valmont to seduce an innocent convent girl, he is also occupied with the conquest of a virtuous married woman. Eventually their human pawns respond, and the consequences prove to be more serious—and deadly—than the players could have ever predicted.

My first link is Lady Susan by Jane Austen, which see wrote between 1794 and 1795, adding a conclusion in 1805, but not published until James Edward Austen-Leigh, her nephew, published it in his Memoir of Jane Austen in 1871.

Lady Susan is about Lady Susan Vernon, told in a series of letters, just like Laclos’s Les Liaisons Dangereuses. Both have manipulative and evil characters without any moral scruples, who delight in their power to seduce others. It’s the  story of an unscrupulous widow who plans to force her daughter into a marriage against her wishes. Lady Susan is an attractive and entertaining and totally wicked character, who nevertheless almost manages to fool people for some of the time at least. She is also trying to captivate her sister-in-law’s brother, whilst still holding on to the affections of a previous lover.

My second link is also a book of letters, but real letters, not fictional ones – Jane Austen’s Letters edited by Deirdre Le Faye, First published in 1932 in this edition Le Faye has added new material that has come to light since 1932, and reordered the letters into their correct chronological sequence. She provided new biographical, topographical and general indexes, annotation, and information on watermarks, postmarks and other physical details of the manuscripts. This gives a unique insight into the daily life of the novelist both intimate and gossipy, observant and informative. The letters bring Jane’s family and friends to life, as well as her surroundings and contemporary events. This is one of my TBRs, but I have dipped into it and read some of the letters.

For my third link I’m staying with Jane Austen with The Genius of Jane Austen: Her Love of Theatre and Why She Is a Hit in Hollywood by Paula Byrne, a radical look at Jane Austen as you’ve never seen her – as a lover of farce, comic theatre and juvenilia. It also looks at stage adaptations of Austen’s novels (including one called Miss Elizabeth Bennet by A. A. Milne) to modern classics, including the BBC Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion, Emma Thompson’s Sense and Sensibility, and Clueless, adapted from Emma.

This book explores Jane Austen’s love of the theatre — she acted in amateur productions, frequently attended the theatre, and even scripted several early works in play form. Austen’s letters show, says Byrne, that she was steeped in theatre and that was a keen theatregoer, watching actors like Dora Jordan.

My fourth link is the theatre and Dora Jordan in Mrs Jordan’s Profession by Claire Tomalin, the biography of Dora Jordan who was acclaimed as the greatest comic actress of her day. Dora and the third son of George III, William, the Duke of Clarence , who, although not legally married, lived together as Mr and Mrs Bland.  She was known as ‘Mrs Jordan’, although there was never a Mr Jordan. She made her stage debut in 1777 at the age of 15 and her first Drury Lane appearance in 1785. The two met and she became his mistress in 1790. The book is packed with information, brilliantly bringing the late 18th and early 19th centuries to life as she tells the story of Dora and her relationship with the Duke of Clarence, later King William IV.

My fifth link is to George III in Alan Bennett’s The Madness of King George. This play premiered on 28 November 1991 and was made into a film in 1994. The introduction to the screenplay includes Bennett’s production diary, notes comparing his stage and screen versions, and the political background to the Court of George III. Also included are a selection of stills from the film. I’ve seen the 1994 film with Nigel Hawthorne as King George and Helen Mirren as Queen Charlotte, which I thought was excellent, but have not read the the book or the play itself.

My final link takes me back to Jane Austen’s books and also to Paula Byrne’s book The Genius of Jane Austen and the theatre. It’s Mansfield Park, which I read about 10 years ago. Fanny Price, as a child of 10 goes to live with her wealthy aunt and uncle, Sir Thomas and Lady Bertram at Mansfield Park. The younger members of the family, convert the library into a theatre and stage a risqué play called Lover’s Vows. I’ll be rereading Mansfield Park later on to refresh my memory and consider what it reveals about Jane Austen’s own views of the theatre in the light of Paula Byrne’s book.

The links in my chain are epistolary novels, Jane Austen’s letters and books, the theatre, and George III, using fiction and nonfiction.

What is in your chain, I wonder?

Next month (March 1, 2025), we’ll start with the 2023 Booker Prize winner, Prophet Song by Paul Lynch.

Lady Susan, The Watsons and Sanditon by Jane Austen

Adam at Roof Beam Reader’s Austen in August event reminded me to read Lady Susan, The Watsons and Sanditon.

Jane Austen has long been one of my favourite authors, ever since I read my mother’s copy of Pride and Prejudice and since then I have re-read it several times and her other full length novels too. But I’ve never read Lady Susan, The Watsons and Sanditon before. In fact it was only reading Carol Shields’ biography of Jane Austen quite some years ago now that I discovered that she had written these books, none of which were published in her lifetime. Lady Susan is a finished novella, whereas The Watsons and Sanditon are two unfinished fragments. Lady Susan and The Watsons were first published in 1871 by her nephew, James Edward Austen-Leigh in his Memoir of Jane Austen, including an account of  Sanditon . The full text of Sanditon wasn’t published until 1925.

Lady Susan

According to Margaret Drabble’s introduction to my Penguin Classics edition there is some evidence that Lady Susan was probably written between 1793-4, when Jane Austen was about 20 years old. Drabble thinks this is the least satisfactory of the three stories, but I can’t agree with her view. I was completely taken with it.

Told in a series of letters, Lady Susan is the  story of an unscrupulous widow who plans to force her daughter into a marriage against her wishes. Lady Susan is an attractive and entertaining and totally wicked character, who nevertheless almost manages to fool people for some of the time at least. She is also trying to captivate her sister-in-law’s brother, whilst still holding on to the affections of a previous lover.

As I was reading Lady Susan it reminded of Laclos’s Les Liaisons Dangereuses, not just because both are epistolary but also the content – manipulative and evil characters without any moral scruples, who delight in their power to seduce others. I wondered if it was possible that Jane Austen had known of this book. It was published in 1782, so it is possible that she knew of it, even if she had not actually read it.

To my mind Lady Susan is unique in Jane Austen’s works and I was delighted to read it. It’s written with style, confidence and humour convincingly illustrating 18th century morals and manners.

The Watsons

Jane Austen began writing this in 1804, her father died in 1805 and she never finished it. Its main character is Emma Watson who after fourteen years of absence returns to her father’s house after being brought up by a wealthy aunt. She had grown up in an affluent household and until her aunt had remarried she’d had expectations of an inheritance. She joins her three unmarried sisters, living with their invalid father  and looking for husbands whilst struggling for money. Mr Watson is a clergyman, so on his death they will lose their home. Maybe it was the parallel with Jane and Cassandra Austen’s own situation that caused Jane to abandon the novel when her own father died.

In some ways it is a little like Pride and Prejudice with its account of a ball and Emma Watson has a spirited nature similar to Elizabeth Bennet’s.  Women without money were often obliged to marry for money, but Emma doesn’t want to. Her sister Elizabeth points out that it is ‘very bad to grow old and be poor and laughed at‘, whereas Emma thinks she would ‘rather be a teacher at a school (and I can think of nothing worse) than marry a man I did not like.’

I liked The Watsons but with just this fragment to go off it is a bit basic and does seem rather similar to Pride and Prejudice. I wished she had finished it.

Sanditon

I thoroughly enjoyed Sanditon, even in its unfinished state. It’s the last fiction that Jane Austen wrote, beginning it in January 1817, the year she died. She was ill and the subject of health is one of its themes, but not in a serious or gloomy way. It has a lively, bright and humorous tone, with three of the characters being hypochondriacs, wonderfully satirised by Jane Austen.

The other theme is change in the form of the development of a seaside resort at Sanditon. It conveys the spirit of change of the times as  Sanditon is developed by two of the landowners, Mr Parker and Lady Denham from ‘a quiet village of no pretensions‘ into ‘a fashionable bathing place‘. The two of them, realising its potential of becoming profitable ‘had engaged in it, and planned and built, and praised and puffed, and raised it to a something of young renown – and Mr Parker could think of nothing else.

It extols the benefits of sea air and sea bathing, Lady Denham decries the need for a doctor saying it would only encourage the servants and the poor to imagine they were ill – and pronouncing that  if her husband had never seen a doctor he would still have been alive, ‘Ten fees, one after the other, did the man take who sent him out of the world. – I beseech you Mr Parker, no doctors here.

Sanditon contrasts the old world with the new upcoming world. Mr Parker has moved from his old comfortable family house set in a sheltered dip two miles from the sea to a new elegant house, which he has named Trafalgar House, not far from a cliff  from which there is a descent to the sea and the bathing machines. Granted it has all the ‘grandeur of storms’, which rocked their bed whilst the wind rages around the house.

There is so much more in these stories than I can write about here (this post is far too long anyway).  I shall enjoy re-reading them in the future. They are so different from each other, probably reflecting the different periods of her life when they were written. And I can’t decide between Lady Susan and Sanditon which one I like best.